MORE than 270 convictions were uncovered following checks on people applying for teaching jobs in Suffolk, new figures have revealed.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

More than 150 checks have been carried out by the Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) since 2010, and 342 police actions, including 278 convictions, have been flagged up, such as wounding, theft, possessing offensive weapons and common assault on a child.

The new statistics, revealed following a Freedom of Information request, show that out of 6,256 CRB checks carried out on people applying for roles as teachers in Suffolk, 155 of those checks uncovered criminal records.

A spokeswoman at the CRB said that the 155 records then revealed a total of 278 convictions, plus 64 cautions, warnings and reprimands.

She said it was not known how many applicants these checks related to as people could apply for more than one check to be carried out at any time. Graham Newman, Suffolk county councillor with responsibility for children and young people services, said that it was vital to remain vigilant when carrying out criminal record checks.

Mr Newman said: “We need to err on the side of caution when it comes to matters such as these. Some issues might by very minor incidents and when it comes to those, it would be down to each school to determine whether that applicant is suitable for the role they are applying for.

“We need checks like this in place but we also need to ensure that people like Ian Huntley don’t slip through the net. We must be vigilant.”

Crimes listed on the checks span from theft of a bicycle and speeding to rioting and assaulting police officers. Nationally, criminal records checks have helped to stop at least 130,000 unsuitable people from working or volunteering with children or vulnerable people.

Graham White, Suffolk secretary of the National Union of Teachers, echoed Mr Newman’s sentiments, but criticised the length of time it takes for CRB checks to be completed.

“It would be down to each school to look at the information provided from the checks and determine a candidate’s suitability.

“Certain things, like drink-driving, wouldn’t necessarily stop you from being able to be a teacher, I wouldn’t think. However it does depend on circumstances.

“I think another issue is that I could go and get my CRB check back today and then go and commit a crime tomorrow and that wouldn’t be reported back to the school. It is issues like that which need to be sorted.”

3 comments

  • Interestingly, it seems that you can be a councillor at district or county level, with past drink-driving convictions; and can attempt to hang on to office with the support of your political chums after assaulting a policeman, until you go too far and send offensive messages to another police person. You can also affect the political decisions of the country as a member of the House of Lords after a light prison sentence for fiddling £1000's in expenses.

    Report this comment

    T Doff

    Monday, May 7, 2012

  • What is siginificantly missing from this article is the fact that once a person in any educational role has had an allegation made against them, let alone a charge brought, they will have that information put onto a CRB...so if they were to have been cleared of an allegation, or found not guilty in court, that information would still stay on file forever...thus affecting any chance of future employment. This was all done because of Ian Huntley and sadly is needed to some extent to prevent a recurrence of that case, but unfortunately there are employers out there who run scared at accusations no matter what the outcome. The problem with CRBs is that they only present the view from the Police side, which is usually couched in language which implies guilt even if the matter hasn't gone to Court. There needs to be some facility for anyone with any information ( whether taken to court or not) on a CRB to have their own statement on there. Potential employers would have a more balanced view, and could then decide whether or not interiew someone, rather than accepting at face value the biased information on offer.

    Report this comment

    Dogberry

    Monday, May 7, 2012

  • Not a very well written article but the number of checks seems to be too high to be solely checks on graduate teachers- I wonder if they were also on anyone wanting to work as a teaching assistant or lesson supervisor. And as a conviction for speeding, drunk driving and resisting arrest is no bar to being a councillor or school governor I see no reason why it should be a bar to working in a school.

    Report this comment

    Daisy Roots

    Monday, May 7, 2012

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Homes24
Jobs24
Drive24
LocalSearch24
MyDate24
MyPhotos24
FamilyNotices24
Weddingsite

loading...
Click here to read more of our digital publications

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT