80 foot 'golf ball' radar tower rejected for Norfolk village
- Credit: Archant, inset: Met Office
Plans for an 80-foot “golf ball” radar tower in a small Norfolk village have been rejected, with councillors going against officers' recommendations.
A Met Office radar tower on Abbey Road in Old Buckenham was rejected by Breckland’s planning committee on Wednesday, after facing stiff opposition from residents, parish councils and the local MP.
Parish Councillor Andy Nicholls argued the location "makes no sense", with other Met Office radars in remote locations away from homes.
Alison Gilmore, a local resident, agreed calling it an “absurd location” and describing the structure as looking like a white golf ball.
She added: “This will be the closest radar to any residential home or any runway in the UK, just 40 meters to the property next door.”
Council officer Tom Donnelly recommended the development for approval, telling the committee officers considered the visual impact of the development to be acceptable.
A previous application for a 28.5m high radar tower was withdrawn in March 2020, over concerns it could impact the nearby Old Buckenham Airfield.
Speaking on behalf of the Met Office, Jim Trice, told councillors the radar would collect data to help prevent flooding and give residents, businesses and farmers extra time to put severe weather measures in place.
- 1 Road cleared after overturned lorry on A47/A11 Thickthorn roundabout
- 2 Inquest into woman's death in A140 crash tragedy delayed
- 3 Diss 'beacon of hope' remembers lives lost to coronavirus
- 4 Local radio station granted license to broadcast until 2027
- 5 8 cheap or free things to do in Norfolk this weekend
- 6 Norfolk has no Covid patients in hospital for first time since August
- 7 Home plan for village pub shelved
- 8 Natural England concerned over blueprint for thousands of homes
- 9 Pink Ladies' Tractor Road Run to return this summer
- 10 SURVEY: Let us know your thoughts on getting the Covid vaccine
Councillors debated the plans for over an hour, with councillor Roger Atterwill calling for a detailed survey to ensure no rare barbastelle bats - believed to nest nearby - would be affected by the development.
“A survey for bats should be carried out between May and September," he said.
"Our survey, from what I can see was in December, I'm not convinced that was the right time.
"It’s a protected species, so we need to make sure as an authority that we are satisfied."
Councillors rejected deferring the application for the survey to be carried out.
Councillors then voted down the application outright, five votes to four, saying it would negatively impact the visual amenity and local ecology.
Speaking after the meeting, Breckland MP George Freeman, who had raised concerns about the plans, welcomed the committee's decision.
He added: “I am pleased that Breckland’s Planning Committee has listened to the views of local residents, businesses and elected officials – and should the Met Office seek to pursue another application, I offer again to help them find a more suitable, alternative site in Mid Norfolk.”