Power station plans receive setback after concerns raised
Plans for a new £200m power station for Eye airfield have received two setbacks.
Suffolk County Council's cabinet and Mid Suffolk District Council have raised a number of concerns about Progress Power's plans for the 299MW gas-fired station, which the developer believes could generate enough electricity to power 400,000 homes.
The cabinet has advised the government - which will make the final decision on the plans - that while it considered the gas fired power station 'appropriate in principle', there would be very serious adverse impacts at a local level which would need to be evaluated.
The recommendation also warned the construction of the electricity sub-station associated with the plant could have an adverse impact in open countryside 'of great sensitivity and value'.
If approved, the sub-station - which could cover an area the size of three football pitches - would be built on land near Mellis and Yaxley.
You may also want to watch:
The fears were echoed by the district council, which raised 'serious concerns' about how the sub-station would connect the plant to the national grid at a meeting on June 16.
Councillors said residents living near the area planned for the sub-station would no longer be able to live there and would have to be compensated as their homes would be value-less on the open market.
- 1 'They thought I was crazy' - New owner's lockdown pub success
- 2 Town reveals plans for post-lockdown celebration
- 3 Calls for ban on development around town's beauty spot
- 4 UEA scientist warns against surge vaccination to combat Indian variant
- 5 Boris Johnson - Time between Covid jabs cut in response to Indian variant
- 6 'Very small' number of Indian Covid variant cases in Norfolk
- 7 Norfolk patients’ group welcomes choice of face-to-face GP consultations
- 8 'I was in tears': Dentist can keep working despite failing 13 patients
- 9 Norfolk Indian Society's Covid crisis appeal
- 10 New EAAA contract covers 24/7 flying and advanced helicopters
Andrew Stringer, councillor for Mendlesham, said: 'Looking at these plans, there's been little thought on this. The sub-station has been plonked onto an agricultural field.'
The developer has said that two sub-station options would be put forward, with the initial criticised plan joined by an alternative that would be two-thirds smaller.
The gas power station is expected to operate for no more than 1,500 hours a year and will feature five stacks, each of up to 30m in height.
There will be a gas connection to the grid through a pipeline running 1.7km to the south and an electricity connection to the grid 1.5km to the west through a cable connecting to the sub-station.
What do you think of the power station plan? Write, giving your full contact details, to: Mercury Letters, 26 Mere Street, Diss IP22 4AD or email email@example.com