Power station plans receive setback after concerns raised
Plans for a new £200m power station for Eye airfield have received two setbacks.
Suffolk County Council's cabinet and Mid Suffolk District Council have raised a number of concerns about Progress Power's plans for the 299MW gas-fired station, which the developer believes could generate enough electricity to power 400,000 homes.
The cabinet has advised the government - which will make the final decision on the plans - that while it considered the gas fired power station 'appropriate in principle', there would be very serious adverse impacts at a local level which would need to be evaluated.
The recommendation also warned the construction of the electricity sub-station associated with the plant could have an adverse impact in open countryside 'of great sensitivity and value'.
If approved, the sub-station - which could cover an area the size of three football pitches - would be built on land near Mellis and Yaxley.
You may also want to watch:
The fears were echoed by the district council, which raised 'serious concerns' about how the sub-station would connect the plant to the national grid at a meeting on June 16.
Councillors said residents living near the area planned for the sub-station would no longer be able to live there and would have to be compensated as their homes would be value-less on the open market.
- 1 Sacked police officer admits child porn charges
- 2 Want to work on a supercar? Lotus is hiring 200 staff
- 3 The 5 most viewed homes on the market in Norfolk last month
- 4 Tributes to popular entertainer after death following tragic accident
- 5 Mental health boss cleared of lying during inquest
- 6 Are we on the verge of a post-Covid mental health crisis?
- 7 Ex-battery hens in need of free-range retirement homes
- 8 Zoo gets £100k to help crayfish
- 9 New landlords relaunch pub with three-course dog menu
- 10 Covid infection rates plummet in Norfolk
Andrew Stringer, councillor for Mendlesham, said: 'Looking at these plans, there's been little thought on this. The sub-station has been plonked onto an agricultural field.'
The developer has said that two sub-station options would be put forward, with the initial criticised plan joined by an alternative that would be two-thirds smaller.
The gas power station is expected to operate for no more than 1,500 hours a year and will feature five stacks, each of up to 30m in height.
There will be a gas connection to the grid through a pipeline running 1.7km to the south and an electricity connection to the grid 1.5km to the west through a cable connecting to the sub-station.
What do you think of the power station plan? Write, giving your full contact details, to: Mercury Letters, 26 Mere Street, Diss IP22 4AD or email firstname.lastname@example.org